home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.cc.sunysb.edu!bgriffin
- From: bgriffin@ic.sunysb.edu (Eli the bearded)
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.religion.scientology,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,alt.games.duke3d,alt.flame,alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.descent,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.bigfoot
- Subject: Re: NT or 95?
- Followup-To: alt.crackers
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 07:36:25 GMT
- Organization: the-rapist is a poor choice of a name for the profession
- Message-ID: <4ksu9p$29d@abel.cc.sunysb.edu>
- References: <3161C78E.478D@hydro.on.ca> <4kc4lk$m8@news.wco.com> <4kfsnu$7s3@hp01.redwood.nl> <316F14F5.B59@gdi.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: csws11.cc.sunysb.edu
- X-GrepFood: My spleen has a Cantor and Siegel green card -- NSA series.
- X-US-Congress: Moronic fucks.
- X-Prohibition: Microsoft Network is prohibited from redistributing this
- post in whole or part, in any form.
-
- Since some moron choose to crosspost this to alt.crackers...
- (Followups directed to alt.crackers exclusively.)
-
- Bloodstained Tierss <tierss19@gdi.net> wrote:
- >Windows 95 - Fast, Unstable (but more stable than Win3.1)
- >Windows NT - Slow, Steady, Damn near uncrashable
- >Linux - Fast, Steady (if you can program. if not then it's useless)
- > Great to tinker around with, Terrible for real work (no
- > apps) Still can't beat Unix for Multiuser, but why bother
- > if you are the only user!!!
-
- Ah, but what about:
- NT [1] - Fast, Spicy and Cheap
- TOS96 [2] - Extremely Powerful, Tasty, Flexible, Steady
-
- Elijah
- ------
- The Illustrated Guide to Crackers
- http://mathlab.sunysb.edu/~elijah/cstuff/
-
- [1] NT==Nachos Technology
- [2] TOS96==Triscuit Operating System, with 96 bit addressing
-